The question is often asked: “How can we assert that Christianity is the one true religion?”
The question is unclear. Some people hear the question and wonder if we’re asserting it’s the only religion that brings value to life, or helps one live more successfully, or answers all of life’s burning questions. If that’s what is meant, the answer is that Christianity is NOT the only ‘true’ religion. Virtually every other religion offers meaning to life and helps one live more “successfully.” I would argue (not in this post, however) that Christianity does it more successfully, if I can defend the greater claim below.
If, however, the question is one of exclusiveness, that is a different story. This is the issue I was dealing with on Sunday. This is the question people object to.
First, let’s just note that, historically, it has NOT been a major issue. It’s one that is a major issue today because many believe that religion is a “subjective” thing without any objective truth value. There’s no evidence for THAT position. However, if Christianity asserts that there is such a thing as evil and Buddhism doesn’t, one is clearly wrong. They both can’t be right.
Christianity doesn’t assert itself to be a merely helpful guide to life. It claims to be the one way to God. If it can’t show that to be true, then the whole belief structure of Christianity is thrown in doubt. That much is fair! So what needs to be done is to defend Christianity, without resorting to using the Bible to defend the Bible. While this topic is far bigger than a single blog post, let me just proceed as follows:
The first question is: Is there a God? If there is, we can move to the second question. If you disagree, this first point needs defending (although there are plenty of other resources out there that can help the honest seeker). I recommend starting with any number of different thinkers like Alvin Platinga, William Alston, Norman Geisler, etc. Or the (formerly) world’s most renowned philosophical atheist, Antony Flew. Assuming the existence of a god, let’s move to the second point.
The second question: Has he revealed himself? And if so, is the Bible the source of that revelation (The Bible asserts that it is – John 1). Without resorting to using Scripture to defend Scripture, we can use external sources to validate those claims. Both archaeology and philosophy. For some summary information on the archaeological reliability of the Old Testament, see R.K. Harrison’s Introduction. However …
It really comes down to the New Testament – more specifically, the resurrection. Larry King (of CNN fame) was asked “who is the one person you’d most like to interview?” His answer: Jesus Christ. If he really rose from the dead, all of history is redefined around his claims.
Here’s the crux: If Jesus really did raise from the dead, then Christianity’s claims to being the one “true” religion (and by true we mean that the facts are trustworthy, that he is indeed the one true way to God – John 14:6) must be taken seriously and given due weight. We further mean that while other religions are useful, they are not ultimately “true” ways of getting to God. And where they contradict the Bible, they are false.
This is the question that bears your time and attention. It’s worth researching. If it’s true, then our claims to being exclusive have merit; if it’s false, we’re all wasting our time. Here are some outstanding resources: William Lane Craig, Josh McDowell, Ben Witherington, Gary Habermas, Stephen Davis, Lee Strobel, et al.
So the answer to the question about whether Christianity is the one “true” religion comes down to narrowing the definition to an agreed-upon one, and evaluating the evidence for its truth claims. Hopefully the above has helped the honest seeker.
Martin Schlomer and Mike Hellum
September 16, 2008 at 9:22 am
Who is Mike Hellum? Didn’t that guy used to go to our church? I heard he joined a cult or something …
… seriously, I appreciate this great posting. One of the things that spoke to me was how you guys acknowledged the value of some of the other religions out there. We often like to villify anything other than what WE believe in as automatically “of the devil” … with no redeeming value whatsoever.
Over the past number of years I have spent time studying and admiring some other religious systems. Buddhism, for instance. If you’ve read “Siddhartha,” the fictionalized story of the Buddha by Herman Hesse, you really have to admire its central character — his internal drive to achieve the divine, his self-honesty and transparency, all the things he struggles with in the process of becoming the Buddha.
Of course it’s tremendously sad, from the perspective we have as Christians (and knowing ourselves), knowing that his struggle really is in vain and that it is quite literally impossible to become like God, outside of the fact that the Son of God himself became sin for us and elevated us to fellowship with God. It’s sad seeing someone striving with the best of intentions, knowing he can never achieve the impossible. But it’s admirable nonetheless.
I also recently have been studying Sikhism, and have a similar level of admiration for its noble goals, for its stated commitment to peace and equality, and for the efforts of many of its adherents. And I’m sure the same thing is true with many other religious systems.
Likewise, I know (and love and admire) many Latter Day Saints. I believe their belief system is fundamentally flawed, but I admire their commitment to core values of living good and decent lives, of love for family, love for church, service of the community, etc. Admirable.
Obviously we need both — a commitment to all that is good and just and right, and also a core commitment to the TRUTH. Jesus represented both those facets. He modeled, embodied, inspired, exhorted and taught us how to live good and right lives. He also not only embodied a commitment to objective TRUTH, he lived it. According to his own confession in John 14:6, he IS Truth — with a capital “T.”
That’s an interesting verse, because Jesus claims three identity tags: “I am the Way, I am the Truth, and I am the Life.”
I think the Way is what we just talked about … how to live. With righteousness, holiness, justice. A commitment to the right. (You can also consider “the Way” to mean the way to God, the path to God.) Truth is what and who God really is. But what is Life?
I think John 1:4-5 gives us a clue: “In him was life, and that life was the light of men. The light shines in the darkness, but the darkness has not understood it.” I think this speaks of true deity, God’s nature of holiness, which lived in Christ as the son of God. Many other religions, despite the admirable qualities which they espouse, aren’t connected with that life. They are swimming in darkness because they don’t realize or confess that Jesus, as the only true God among us, truly is the only way to God. There is life in none other!
We can all try our best to live bright and shining lives, to follow even the good and noble teachings of Christ on how we treat our neighbor and love God. But without our equal commitment to the Truth of God, and the Life of God which resides in Jesus alone, we are sitting on a one-legged stool.
October 30, 2011 at 2:03 am
{Great|Wonderful|Fantastic|Magnificent|Excellent} beat ! I {wish to|would like to} apprentice while you amend your {site|web site|website}, how {can|could} i subscribe for a blog {site|web site|website}? The account {aided|helped} me a acceptable dea…
I am extremely impressed with your writing skills and also with the layout on your blog. Is this a paid theme or did you modify it yourself? Anyway keep up the nice quality writing, it’s rare to see a great blog like this one these days…..